Investigation of flu lies and mind-blowing lies
Taken from: Waking Times
Thanks to Chiara Remedia and Raffaella Sevieri for the translation into Italian
Not all mainstream medical professionals are trying to lie about the flu.
Most of these people, because of their indoctrination, simply assume that conventional wisdom is true.
But climbing to the top of the ladder, for example public health agencies such as the US Center for Disease Control (CDC), we certainly find some first-class liars on board.
The information I'm about to reveal - and I've already published it before - falls into the category: HOW CAN IT BE TRUE? IF IT WAS TRUE, THEN EVERYTHING WE WAS TOLD AND EVERYTHING WE BELIEVED IS INCREDIBLY FALSE.
And that's a problem for many people. It is preferred to cling to a lie rather than to exchange fidelity for truth when truth shows authorities in a completely new light.
So ... fasten your seat belts, let's go.
The first point is: how many people in the United States die of flu each year?
The CDC published the same figure every year; 36.000. Subsequently, after this figure was finally contested, they changed the official estimate. They spoke ambiguously: “The flu seasons are unpredictable and can be serious. For a 30-year period, between 1976 and 2006, estimates of flu deaths in the United States ranged from a minimum of approximately 3.000 to a maximum of approximately 49.000 people. "
In December 2005, the British Medical Journal (online version) published a shocking report by Peter Doshi, which shook the walls of the CDC.
Here is a quote from Doshi's report, "The numbers of death from flu in the United States are more than public relationswhat scientific?"(BMJ 2005; 331: 1412): "[According to CDC statistics]," flu and pneumonia "caused 62.034 victims in 2001, including 61.777 attributable to pneumonia and 257 to influenza, and in only 18 cases the influenza virus was positively identified".
Here, the CDC has created a general category that groups deaths from flu and pneumonia. Why do they do it? Because they presumably assume that deaths from pneumonia are flu-derived complications.
This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes (not just the flu, Ed).
Worse still, in all deaths from flu and pneumonia, the presence of a flu virus was detected only in 18 cases.
Therefore, the CDC could not have said with certainty that more than 18 people had died of flu in 2001. Not 36.000 died. 18 dead.
Doshi continued his assessment of the statistics published by the CDC on deaths due to flu: "Between 1979 and 2001, the [CDC] data show an average of 1348 deaths [flu] per year (range 257 to 3006) ". These figures refer to influenza separate from pneumonia.
This death toll is obviously much lower than the figure of 36.000 that was repeated in a parrot.
However, if you add the reasonable condition that laboratory tests must actually find the flu virus in patients, the number of deaths from flu could plummet further.
In other words, it's about promotion, advertising and uncertainty.
"Well, we said 36.000 people die of flu every year in the United States. But in reality, probably the number is closer to 20. Who knows? However, we can't admit it, because if we did, we would reveal our gigantic maneuvers The whole campaign to scare people and get them to get a flu shot would have about the same effect if we warned people to bring iron umbrellas with them, just in case the toasters fell from the upstairs windows ... and by the way , we would be put in prison for fraud. "
[Note: Before Doshi published the aforementioned article on deaths from the flu, I was in charge of a series of emails with him on this issue and the independent researcher, Martin Maloney, made a great contribution to discovering the deception of the CDC. ]
The second big problem is: how many people who have been diagnosed with the flu really have the flu?
Peter Doshi again, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals another monstrosity.
As Doshi states, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken each year from influenza patients in the United States and tested in the laboratory. Here's the highlight: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.
This means that most of the people in America that doctors have diagnosed with the flu don't have the flu virus in their bodies.
So, they don't have the flu.
Therefore, even if the flu vaccine is assumed to be useful and safe, it is not possible to prevent all those "flu cases" that are not flu cases.
The vaccine cannot work.
The vaccine is not designed to prevent fake flu unless pigs can fly.
Here is the exact quote from Doshi's BMJ review, "Influence: to market vaccines to market diseases"(BMJ 2013; 346: f3037):
"... even the ideal flu vaccine, perfectly compatible with the circulating strains of wild influenza virus and able to block all influenza viruses, can only address a small part of the flu problem because most cases of influenza seem to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are tested in the United States. Of those tested, on average 16% test positive for influenza. ... It is no wonder that so many people have the feeling that "flu shots don't work": for the most part, they can't work."
Because most patients diagnosed with the flu don't have the flu.
So even if you are a real supporter of the mainstream vaccine theory, here you are cornered. They are cheating you.
Let me give you a giant example of this deceptive way of counting flu cases. It is an influenza epidemic that you may remember, the swine flu.
In late summer 2009, the swine flu epidemic was advertised by the CDC. The agency was asking all Americans to get vaccinated with the swine flu vaccine.
The problem was that the CDC was hiding a scandal.
At the time, CBS investigative star reporter Sharyl Attkisson was working on a story about swine flu. He found that the CDC had secretly stopped counting disease cases in the United States, while, of course, it continued to warn Americans of its uncontrolled spread.
Understand that the CDC's main job is to count cases and report numbers.
What was the agency doing?
Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:
report: In 2009 he continued the case of the coverage of the so-called swine flu pandemic. He found that in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, by ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting swine flu cases in America. Still, they continued to instill fear of the "pandemic" without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn't it another investigation of yours that was closed? Was there nothing else to discover?
Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than these. We found out through our efforts with the Freedom of Information (FOI) who before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting swine flu cases, learned that almost none of the cases that counted as swine flu was, in effect, attributable to swine flu or any kind of influence! The interest in the story by a [CBS] executive has been very great. He said it was "the most original story" he had seen on the entire swine flu epidemic. But others have lobbied to stop him [after it was posted on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no broadcast [of CBS television] wanted to touch the subject. They transmitted numerous stories that fueled the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would have thrown new and original light on all the hype. [Attkisson's article] was fair, accurate, legally approved and a great story. With the CDC keeping the true swine flu statistics secret, many people in the public vaccinated themselves and their children with an experimental vaccine that might not have been necessary.
—End the extract of the interview—
It was common practice for all American physicians to send blood samples of their patients diagnosed with swine flu, or "more likely" patients with swine flu, to testing labs. And overwhelmingly, those champions were coming back with the result: it wasn't swine flu, no flu whatsoever.
This was the big secret. Here is what the CDC hid. That's why they stopped reporting swine flu case numbers. This is what Attkisson had discovered. That's why it's the case has been closed.
But it gets worse.
Because about three weeks after Attkisson's findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously panicking, decided to double. If a lie is discovered, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.
Here, starting from an article dated 12 November 2009, the WebMD article is the CDC's answer: "Incredibly, it is assumed that 14 million to 34 million US residents - the CDC's best guess is 22 million - will have H1N1 swine flu by October 17 ." ("22 million cases of swine flu in the United States", by Daniel J. DeNoon).
Do you have your eyes out of orbit? Of course yes.
In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stopped counting swine flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of laboratory tests conducted on probable swine flu patients showed no signs of swine flu or any other type of flu. .
There is no swine flu epidemic.
But the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION swine flu cases in the United States.
So ... the premise that the CDC would never lie about important issues like, oh, a vaccine that can cause autism ... you can sleep soundly. (archive here https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/vaccinegate/ )
The CDC will lie about everything it wants. It will go boldly where no one interested in true science will go.
He will completely ignore his mandate to take care of human health and continue on his way undisturbed - as long as people are willing to accept lies instead of the truth, as long as people prefer to hold on to what the authorities tell them to believe .