"Vaccines are not inherently harmful. They hurt if given unchecked"
The prof. Franco Nobile, oncologist and semeiotics teacher in Siena. "The vaccination protocol itself is flawless. But there is carelessness and superficiality. Careful immunological tests should be done before administering them. If used improperly, they can lower immunity and open doors to cancers and other diseases. ". And he tells of repeated administrations, of intervals and procedures not respected, of poor transparency of the military health system
Roma - That of military health and vaccination protocols that involve everyone is an impeccable system on paper but strongly deficient in practice. Lack of controls, careless doctors, vaccines made indiscriminately at all, put the lives of those who undergo them at risk without being able to really resist. In retrospect, after falling ill, proving that you have contracted the disease at work is very difficult.
Prof Franco Nobile is a specialist in oncology, lecturer in surgical semeiotics at the University of Siena, President of the Siena section of the Italian league against cancer, a national center of excellence. For years he has been following the investigations related to tumors developed by the military, he has traveled that of depleted uranium to now devote himself to the damage caused by vaccines.
Professor Nobile, do vaccines cause so much damage?
"Vaccines are not harmful in themselves, on the contrary, they are an important achievement for our society. They do a lot of harm if used inappropriately, if done all together, if they contain toxic preservatives such as mercury and aluminum, if made on people who are not At that point it is shown that the defenses are lowered and the doors are opened to very serious diseases such as cancer, leukemia but even more frequently autoimmune diseases: thyroiditis, arthritis, colitis. I'll give you an example: a newly hired soldier is subjected to the vaccines but he is not asked if he already has tetanus. Maybe he was a mechanic before, he already had tetanus and that new vaccine hurts him. It would be correct to do antibody and immunological tests that analyze the antibodies that each person already has, many tragic consequences would be avoided. Furthermore, the procedures are correct, but their application is not ".
It is serious. How does this happen? Is it possible that you consciously want to put these people's lives at risk?
"By now all doctors know risks and effects. But no, I don't think there is a concrete criminal will ... I would rather speak of carelessness, lack of attention, superficiality. Many military doctors have double or triple jobs, often these vaccines are made by nurses, just injected, without too many fuss, then many times there is a hurry, if 500 people have to leave for abroad, perhaps accurate analyzes are carried out on all of them, it turns out that 100 cannot be vaccinated and cannot leave. The procedure becomes long, expensive, difficult. It cuts short, everyone gets the same vaccines and so some of them get sick. I found groups of soldiers who every time they left for a mission were vaccinated again ".
So is it also an economic waste, as well as a health risk?
"Yes, many times over all these years I have wondered why military health care was created. Perhaps at the beginning we wanted to give those who wear the uniform a privileged, excellent channel. Today the truth is that these people would be better off. if they passed by the ASL like all normal citizens and it would also be cheaper and more transparent. I am part of the Cancer League and of the Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry on Depleted Uranium, we are unable to do research because the Military Health does not allow it ".
What should the next step be?
"In addition to respecting the protocols, developing free immunological tests for all military to indicate which vaccines to do and whether to get them. These would already save many lives."
Would it be very expensive?
"No, not at all, thinking about large numbers and making agreements with immunology institutes would be a negligible expense compared to the advantage obtained".